Early morning fishing, Jisr-az-Zarqa |
I’ve spent the past 4-5 months doing fieldwork in a small, Eastern Mediterranean town. Jisr-az-Zarqa (Jisr), the only
exclusively Arab town on the Israeli coastline, is economically distressed and
densely populated – 14,500 people live in an area of 1.6km2.
It has high unemployment and many families live below the poverty line. About
30 artisanal fishermen (all with families), live in the town of Jisr. They have
huts (where they store their fishing gear – gill nets and long lines) in Jisr’s
‘fishing village’ which is located on Jisr’s undeveloped shoreline. Five years
ago, one of the fishermen turned his hut (without planning permission) into a
restaurant – serving freshly caught fish at weekends. Since 2010, the Israeli
government have been putting together a new development plan for Jisr, and the Israel National Parks Authority (INPA) have put together another plan to expand existing nature reserve and national park designations in the area. Neither of the plans have yet been implemented. Many of the changes proposed by the INPA plan involve development of the
shoreline, including deepening and enlarging the harbour, replacing the fishing
huts with ‘nicer’ buildings and restaurants, and building a coastal walkway
along the beach. The beach in Jisr is designated as a national park (where it
is permitted to have developments, such as restaurants), in contrast to the
adjoining Taninim nature reserve, where the purpose is conservation of the
environment and where no development is allowed. The shoreline is owned by the State and managed by the
Israeli Land Administration (Minhal Mekarkei Yisrael).
Popular local swimming hole, Jisr-az-Zarqa |
The research I’m doing is a pilot project which aims to explore
perceptions of litter in Jisr (both town and fishing village), identify the
main challenges to the prevention of litter (including derelict fishing gear)
on Jisr’s beach and in its sea, and to
identify approaches that could reduce the marine and coastal litter in
Jisr’s fishing village area. Although the importance of
research into perceptions of marine litter has increased in recent years, there
is actually very little in-depth qualitative research on perceptions of marine
litter. Research to date has tended to use quantitative surveys to explore such
perceptions.
Bathing beach litter, Jisr-az-Zarqa |
So far, I’ve carried out in-depth interviews with 6 local
fishermen and 5 representatives of two institutional structures directly
relevant to the governance of Jisr’s shoreline – the Israel National Park
Authority (Rashut HaTeva ve HaGanim) and Jisr’s local council. One of the main
objectives of the pilot project is to provide insights into how artisanal
fishermen perceive marine litter and their awareness of its impact on their
fishing activities and the marine environment. As I started interviewing the
fishermen (in Arabic, with the help of Mona Sabbah, an Arabic-speaking research
assistant), it became increasingly evident that their relationships with the
governing institutions (and the relationships between those institutions) were
directly relevant to the challenges to the prevention of litter on Jisr’s
shoreline. In short, and unsurprisingly, the underlying historical, cultural,
social and political context matters a lot. Understanding this local context is
crucial in providing guidance on whether certain measures to reduce marine
litter would work or not.
For example, there are usually no bins on, or near, the
beach. People who visit the beach (locals and non-locals alike) generally leave
their litter behind them. The initial fishermen I interviewed complained that
they don’t have a big skip nearby, and alleged that the council has refused to
provide them with one. However, when a skip appeared a few weeks ago (put there
by the INPA), it lasted about a week before
it was burnt. Some of the fishermen had been using it, and so had employees of
the INPA, who recently started to regularly clean the beach. So why was it
burnt?
The INPA skip - before and after |
The in-depth interviews helped me to understand that most of
the fishermen are hugely distrustful and suspicious of the INPA. There is an
ingrained fear of (government-driven) improvement of an area leading to
dispossession and loss of control – over land and over resources. Environmental
protection is perceived as a poorly disguised tool of oppression. The
fishermen’s narrative goes like this: ‘the INPA and the government only want to
clean this place up so they can clear us (the fishermen) out of here and have
it for themselves’. The historical context here is crucial: Palestinian-Israelis have a very complex and difficult relationship with the land. As one
person (not from Jisr) put it to me – ‘It
is yours, but it’s not yours, so you don’t care at the same time as you do
care. You love the place, but hate the place. You want to see it clean, but you
f*!^ it up.’
High school students collecting litter from road leading to Jisr's beach |
These insights have important practical relevance if we
think about what measures might be effective to reduce marine litter on Jisr’s
shoreline. It’s certainly not as simple as putting bins on or near the beach
(the council tried that three years ago – they were burnt too). Before bins are
put there, questions should be asked, such as:
·
Who is providing the bins?
·
What kind of relationship
do the fishermen have with the institution that is putting the bins there?
·
What institution(s) (if
any) do they trust, and under what circumstances?
·
What would need to change
in order to prevent bins on the beach being vandalised and to ensure that they are used?
In short, we need to understand the values, worldviews and
norms of local coastal users so that we can figure out what kind of policy
interventions will work – and which ones will most definitely not.
(Published research article available here)
(Published research article available here)
Sunset, fishermen's beach, Jisr-az-Zarqa |
No comments:
Post a Comment